November 27, 2009

Dr. Muller asks "How Many Points?"

In an age where to be Reformed is equated with an adherence to “five points,” Dr. Muller asks the question, “How Many Points?”

I once met a minister who introduced himself to me as a “five-point Calvinist.” I later learned that, in addition to being a self-confessed five-point Calvinist, he was also an anti-paedobaptist who assumed that the church was a voluntary association of adult believers, that the sacraments were not means of grace but were merely “ordinances” of the church, that there was more than one covenant offering salvation in the time between the Fall and the eschaton, and that the church could expect a thousand-year reign on earth after Christ’s Second Coming but before the ultimate end of the world. He recognized no creeds or confessions of the church as binding in any way. I also found out that he regularly preached the “five points” in such a way as to indicate the difficulty of finding assurance of salvation: He often taught his congregation that they had to examine their repentance continually in order to determine whether they had exerted themselves enough in renouncing the world and in “accepting” Christ. This view of Christian life was totally in accord with his conception of the church as a visible, voluntary association of “born again” adults who had “a personal relationship with Jesus.”

In retrospect, I recognize that I should not have been terribly surprised at the doctrinal context or at the practical application of the famous five points by this minister — although at the time I was astonished. After all, here was a person, proud to be a five-point Calvinist, whose doctrines would have been repudiated by Calvin. In fact, his doctrines would have gotten him tossed out of Geneva had he arrived there with his brand of “Calvinism” at any time during the late sixteenth or the seventeenth century. Perhaps more to the point, his beliefs stood outside of the theological limits presented by the great confessions of the Reformed churches—whether the Second Helvetic Confession of the Swiss Reformed church or the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism of the Dutch Reformed churches or the Westminster standards of the Presbyterian churches. He was, in short, an American evangelical.

You can read Muller’s full article reproduced from the Calvin Theological Journal, Vol. 28 (1993): 425-33 over at the Riddleblog.

Possibly Related Posts:

  1. There Are More than Tulips in the Reformed Field
  2. Semper Reformanda
  3. The Hallway and the Rooms
  4. Are Creeds Necessary?
  5. An Interview with Rev. Daniel R. Hyde – “Welcome to a Reformed Church”

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [1]

Comments (1)

  1. November 27, 2009
    armeniancalvinist said...

    While I appreciated much that he said in his article, it appears that Dr. Muller committed the cardinal tactical error of not knowing his opponents. It is surprising and sad that someone as brilliant as Dr. Muller clearly is, would show so little historical and theological knowledge of his opponents. To group Reformed Baptists and Particular Baptists on the one hand, with hyper-Calvinists, Arminian Baptists, and typical evangelical baptists on the other is to slanderously misrepresent them.But then this is the same lack of historical understanding and failure to grasp the Reformed Baptist position that several other Presbyterian and Reformed theologians have demonstrated recently.

Leave a Reply