Technology, no matter how promising and brilliant, will never satisfy

Technology, no matter how promising and brilliant, will never satisfy.

Technology, no matter how promising and brilliant, will never satisfy. Penned long before the Internet and iPads, Pascal explains why in Pascal’s Pensees (“thoughts”):

All men seek happiness… And yet after such a great number of years, no one without faith has reached the point to which all continually look. All complain, princes and subjects, noblemen and commoners, old and young, strong and weak, learned and ignorant, healthy and sick, of all countries, all times, all ages, and all conditions… What is it then that this desire and this inability proclaim to us, but that there was once in man a true happiness of which there now remain to him only the mark and empty trace, which he in vain tries to fill from all his surroundings, seeking from things absent the help he does not obtain in things present? But these are inadequate, because the infinite abyss can only be filled by an infinite and immutable object, that is to say, only by God Himself.

Ultimate satisfaction and contentment is found only in God. It is alienation from our Creator, caused by our sin, that results in all discontentment, dissatisfaction, and restlessness.

In being reconciled to God through faith in Jesus Christ, the problem at the root of every human is solved. By God’s grace, satisfaction is possible in spite of circumstances or material possessions because we find our satisfaction in Him.

The Apostle Paul offered comfort with the knowledge that “neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:38).

An example of technology’s failure to satisfy

I was struck by the refreshing honesty of Mat Honan in this rather unconventional report (language warning) on CES 2012, the world’s largest consumer technology tradeshow.

In it, Honan describes his dissatisfaction with technology:

“There is a hole in my heart dug deep by advertising and envy and a desire to see a thing that is new and different and beautiful. A place within me that is empty, and that I want to fill up. The hole makes me think electronics can help. And of course, they can…At least for a while. At least until they are obsolete. At least until they are garbage.

Electronics are our talismans that ward off the spiritual vacuum of modernity; gilt in Gorilla Glass and cadmium. And in them we find entertainment in lieu of happiness, and exchanges in lieu of actual connections.”

Two ways to view technological innovation

To satisfy

Technological innovation can be exhausting when it’s done in an attempt to satisfy—to fill the emptiness inside (as both Pascal and Mat Honan describe it). Innovation must go on because satisfaction is never found. We’re always waiting for the next iPhone, for something newer and shinier, because it may be the answer to satisfy my craving heart. This has turned technology into an idol and it will always fail to deliver on its promise to satisfy.

To reflect the One who satisfies

David Murray, the teacher in the brilliant video God’s Technology, often speaks of God as the “ultimate Inventor, Innovator, and Creator who allows men and women to discover His inventions, innovations, and creations…” Technological innovation can be done, not for the purpose of finding satisfaction, but to reflect Him, the original Innovator.

When technological innovation is viewed in this light, it ceases being an attempt to satisfy the unsatisfied, and instead becomes what it is in reality, blessings from the God who alone satisfies.

Pray for the dissatisfied

Pray for those millions who continually experience the dissatisfaction of every new gadget quickly becoming “garbage,” that it would drive them to seek the One who ultimately and eternally satisfies—the Lord Jesus Christ.

5 Responses to “Technology, no matter how promising and brilliant, will never satisfy”

  1. Dan Smith January 16, 2012 at 11:51 pm #

    Nathan, I would add one more way to view technology, but in truth it relates to your second point. We can view technology as a tool to magnify the One who Satisfies. The reason I point this out is because a farmer probably doesn’t treat a plow the way we treat an ipad. a plow is a tool, whereas an iphone, droid, you name it, is at times a gadget for us. I think we should see things more as tools to get the word out about our Father. Great article, especially in the closing. Pray indeed!

  2. Rob Imberger January 17, 2012 at 5:06 pm #

    I read Honan’s piece too. His vision of a tech-addicted dystopia is really discomforting and unappealing, yet he admits he can’t make it not appeal to him. By grace alone, we can have our appetites changed to want to want true Treasure.

    Thanks for nailing the issues brother: you’ve got a well-expressed, Christ-exalting treatment there of what will be increasingly a pastoral problem/opportunity for me and my peers.

  3. Ian Hall January 18, 2012 at 3:44 pm #

    “Technology, no matter how promising and brilliant, will never satisfy” – very true. Good post. Thank you so much.

  4. Glenn Hendrickson January 20, 2012 at 7:11 am #

    I appreciate the quote from Pascal and agree wholeheartedly with the conclusion. I remember getting my kindle back when it cost about 260, now it is 2 generations old and worth about 1/2 or 1/3 the price of a new one! lol

    I was SO excited and happy to get it but it never did anything for me that left me truly, deeply satisfied. Any gadgets we collect and don’t use to defend & advance God’s kingdom are worthless.

  5. Staci Eastin April 28, 2012 at 9:34 am #

    First of all, good post. That’s very true.

    The Pascal quote is good in its own right. It will be perfect for some teaching I’ll be doing next weekend, so thanks for that, too.

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>