May 31, 2010

The Major Works of Herman Witsius

…will soon be available at Reformation Heritage Books.

I’ve only read a summary version of his The Economy of the Covenants between God and Man so I look forward to owning a copy and working through it. His two other major works being released are The Apostles’ Creed and The Lord’s Prayer.

You can buy them separately, or for the best price buy them all together.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [2]

April 22, 2010

The Hallway and the Rooms

Michael Horton has written again in response to the Piper / Warren controversy this time reflecting on what it means to be “Reformed” and the state of the “Young, Restless and Reformed” movement.

I rather like his suggested label for the YRR movment, “Evangelical Calvinism”. What are you thoughts?

Be sure to read the whole thing, but here is an excerpt:

“Reformed” has a specific meaning. It’s not defined by movements, parachurch ministries, or powerful leaders, but by a confession that is lived out in concrete contexts across a variety of times and places. The Westminster Standards and the Three Forms of Unity (Belgic Confession, Heidelberg Catechism, and Canons of Dort) define what it means to be Reformed. Like Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Anabaptism, Reformed Christianity is a particular tradition. It’s not defined by a few fundamentals, but by a whole system of faith and practice. If being Reformed can be reduced to believing in the sovereignty of God and election, then Thomas Aquinas is as Reformed as R. C. Sproul. However, the Reformed confession is a lot more than that. Even the way it talks about these doctrines is framed within a wider context of covenant theology.

Continue reading The Hallway and the Rooms.

Evangelical Calvinism.”

Tagged as // , , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [14]

April 2, 2010

Getting The Gospel Right & Getting The Gospel Out

Michael Horton has responded to questions raised over a 2004 interview Modern Reformation published with Rick Warren. Personally, I believe his thoughts on Rick Warren are very helpful, but I thought it pressing to quote his concluding paragraph here:

“Long ago, the evangelist D. L. Moody responded to criticisms of his message and pragmatic methods with the quip, “I like my way of doing it better than your way of not doing it.”  We can be so proud of getting the gospel right while we don’t bother to get the gospel out to those who need it.  Furthermore, we can be self-confident in our theological integrity while ignoring the Word of God when it impinges on questions of social concern.  Yet the answer is not “deeds over creeds,” but to be re-introduced to the creeds that generate the deeds that are the fruit of genuine faith.  Getting the gospel right and getting the gospel out, as well as loving and serving our neighbors, comprise the callings of the church and of Christians in the world. However, confusing these is always disastrous for our message and mission.” – Michael S. Horton

Tagged as // , , , ,
Filed in // Quotes

Comments [2]

March 22, 2010

The Westminster Standards Database

…looks to be a very helpful resource for searching and for learning The Westminster Standards.

Especially helpful is the quiz you can take to help you memorise the Larger & Shorter Catechism. Their site will ask you a question (from your nominated starting position) and you must type in the correct answer. Punctuation isn’t important, but if you do get it wrong it allows you to compare your answer with the correct one. It’s even colour coded!

Go and visit The Westminster Standards Database.

Thanks to Providence OPC for putting this together and to Enrique who brought it to my attention.

Tagged as // , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [0]

March 16, 2010

An Interview with Rev. Daniel R. Hyde – “Welcome to a Reformed Church”

With the release of the new book, Welcome to a Reformed Church, I had the privilege of interviewing its author, Daniel R. Hyde. I trust you’ll find this interview edifying and his book even more so.

Rev. Daniel R. HydeRev. Daniel R. Hyde has been the pastor of the Oceanside United Reformed Church in Carlsbad/Oceanside, California, since it was planted in 2000. He is the author of seven books (see his bibliography here). He has a M.Div. from Westminster Seminary California and will complete his Th.M. this May under Joel Beeke and Derek Thomas at Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary with a thesis entitled, “Of Great Importance and of High Concernment: The Liturgical Theology of John Owen (1616–1683).”

1. Danny, your recent book, In Living Color, initially began as a pastoral letter to your congregation in response to Mel Gibson’s film The Passion of the Christ. How did you come to write your latest book, Welcome to a Reformed Church: A Guide for Pilgrims?

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss my book, Nathan. As a church planter in an area with no other Reformed church I am always looking for clear, concise, and cogent literature to give out to the droves of visitors, inquirers, and curious onlookers that come to my congregation. The book found its infancy several years ago. I was giving out dozens and dozens of other small books that sought to explain the basics of the Reformed faith, but they either were too small or too narrowly focused on only a few doctrines. What I needed was an introductory book that I could give visitors that would also explain in a substantial way what we are all about. At the same time I wrote a church webpage with the title of the book, which then it lengthened into a little booklet for our literature rack, then into a proposal that was rejected by a publisher, and finally into a better proposal and manuscript that Reformation Trust so graciously accepted.

2. You were not raised in a Reformed church. How did you end up not only joining a Reformed church but eventually being an ordained minister in a Reformed denomination?

I was baptized as a Roman Catholic, sort of jointly raised in Calvary Chapel and the Roman Catholic Church early in my youth, and then converted in a Foursquare church. I went on to an Assemblies of God liberal arts college and was a youth pastor in a non-denominational Pentecostal church for three years. So, no, I did not grow up in a Reformed church! My journey to the Reformed church started with disillusionment in college over the religion I saw there. I praise God, though, as my theology professor was an Assemblies of God minister but also a staunch believer in the so-called five points of Calvinism. He gave me books and a lot of his time. I eventually began listening to the White Horse Inn radio program with Mike Horton and Kim Riddlebarger, went to a service one Lord’s Day and thought I was in heaven. I still was a youth pastor in that non-denom Pentecostal church, but after I graduated college, I enrolled at Westminster Seminary California, met a brother who attended the Christian Reformed Church (the same denomination Mike and Kim were ministering in), and that was that.

3. Why do Reformed churches speak about creeds and confessions; isn’t the Bible enough?

In my particular tradition, the Dutch Reformed, we speak of believing our creeds and confessions because (quia) they agree with the Word of God. Like I wrote in my book, The Good Confession, every Christian and church has a creed or confession, it’s just a matter of being honest about what it is and whether it is biblical. So we have them to express what we believe, to protect us from false doctrine, and as a means of unifying us in the pattern of sound words.

4. You spend an entire chapter discussing Covenant Theology. You note that the “concept of covenant” is what “unifies all the acts in the ‘greatest drama staged’” (p. 52). For those still exploring Covenant Theology, can you please provide some examples of how a belief in Covenant Theology makes a Reformed church practically different on any given Lord’s Day compared to other Protestant churches?

Yes, our covenant theology is eminently practical. After all, a covenant is the means whereby God has drawn close to his people since the Garden. Basically, covenant theology is practiced in our worship. In a covenant God speaks in grace and his people respond in gratitude, and we follow that pattern in our liturgy, as God speaks in the call to worship, and we respond in song, etc. Covenant theology also informs our preaching. We view the congregation as a covenant people, meaning, it is a mixed assembly. Thus the preacher must never tire of preaching repentance faith, the necessity of conversion and regeneration, all while he proclaims Christ through his text.

5. At the end of your chapter titled, “Justification: Grace Alone, Faith Alone, Christ Alone” you state, “This is a story we must hear and learn over and over again” (p. 86). Could you please expand on this statement?

The gospel is for sinners. Christians are sinners. I trust readers can make the conclusion. It’s always fascinating to listen to what’s being preached in churches. In many, the gospel is assumed to be believed so it’s on to the more important matters of practical Christian living: being a good mom, caring for your finances as God wants you, etc. In others, everyone is assumed to be an unbeliever so the constant refrain of God’s love and the necessity to come forward in an altar call is heard. In others, preaching becomes a doctrinal lecture. Well, I find Paul so fascinating in this discussion. He desired to preach Christ and him crucified, he wrote of justification over and over again, and he used that doctrine as a source of comfort and ground for the Christian life.

6. Over more recent years a new label has gained wider acceptance and prominence; that is, the label, “Reformed Charismatic.” Can Reformed theology legitimately be coupled with Charismatic theology, and furthermore, what are your general thoughts on this movement’s influence amongst Reformed churches?

Given my background, I think I can speak to this with some legitimacy. Reformed theology and Charismatic theology are antithetical theologies. One says “it is finished” and that we have “every spiritual blessing in the heavenlies” while the other says there is something more. I do not see how a theology that proclaims itself as “the full or whole gospel” can be appropriated by Reformed churches without grave consequences to assurance, worship, and preaching. I would say to those who consider themselves “Reformed Charismatics” that the Reformed tradition believe in the Holy Spirit, believes in a personal communion with him and the Father and Son, and believes in a vibrant experience of his person and work. The greatest example of that is from the Puritan pen of John Owen, who wrote nine books and over 1,200 pages that came to be known as his work on the Holy Spirit (Banner of Truth edition, volumes 3 and 4.

7. In your discussion of the sacraments you mention certain liberties in regards to baptism. However, when you discuss the Lord’s Supper you simply state that the “Lord’s Supper is purely administered when bread…and wine are given…” (p. 109). Are there any liberties in regards to the elements of the Lord’s Supper as you state there are for the mode of baptism? For example, can “wine” legitimately be replaced with the unfermented fruit of the vine (grape juice)?

The issue of what kind of bread—leavened or unleavened—has been a matter of indifference in the Reformed tradition. The issue of wine versus grape juice, of course, has a complicated history here in the States due to prohibition and politics. In our congregation we offer both, to accommodate to the consciences and scruples of those to whom we minister.

8. After discussing the Scriptures you state, “…the real question is whether the confession that Scripture is God’s inspired, canonical, authoritative, sufficient, and perspicuous revelation actually affects how Christians in any particular church practice their faith and live their lives” (p. 48). Can you give some examples as to how a church today may confess the aforementioned about the Scriptures but practically deny it?

The most obvious example to me is how so many Bible-believing churches hardly read the Bible in public worship. The Scripture readings have been dropped. At best, the pastor will read a verse or two throughout his “sermon.” Not to simply bash evangelical churches, let me give an example close to home. In my own circles when many churches never stop and think about what they do and why, but simply say, “It’s always been done that way.” A final example would be the total appropriation of technology into the church without stopping to think, first, what media has gone already given, and why, and second, what effect will this have on the church in the future? I tried to deal with this in my book, In Living Color.

9. Is worship different in Reformed churches and why?

Yes it is. In the “Introduction” I recognize for most who come to a Reformed church for the first time that it is a different. It is different because the attitude is one of reverence for the holiness of God. This strikes people as cold, boring, lifeless, and joyless, but we express our joy and love for God out of reverence. It is different because the modus operandi is to do only what God commands and requires, and not what fills the seats or feels good. Another difference is that the preaching of the Word, at least in my denomination, takes up the majority of time in a given worship service.

10. How does Reformed Theology impact the daily piety of a Christian?

As the Heidelberg Catechism begins, “That I, with body and soul, both in life and in death, am not my own, but belong to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ.” Reformed theology emphasizes that we are servants of Christ and that everything we do flows out of gratitude for that amazing truth—I devote myself to his Word, I devote myself to prayer, I devote myself to his church, I devote myself to his people.

11. If the preached Word is the “primary means of grace” (p. 134) how does a Reformed church reach unbelievers with the gospel who do not attend a public worship service on the Lord’s Day?

First and foremost by the preaching itself, which means members must be motivated to be salt and light, give their testimony often, and invite unbelievers with them to hear what God has done. We believe in the priesthood of all believers and the doctrine of vocation so that means Christians are free to serve God and to live for him in the world as he commands. As a church plant, we have a strong focus on this as well as things like hospitality, using contacts members have with others in the community, and through the means of the internet, literature, and audio.

12. What exhortation would you give to a Christian who is considering joining a Reformed church?

I would say that you need to understand the Christian life as a pilgrimage and that in this life we are called to unite ourselves to a true church, to the most biblical church we can find. I pray that a Reformed church’s teaching ministry would serve as a road map on your pilgrimage, as we prepare ourselves to enter the celestial city that has foundations, whose builder and maker is God.

13. Finally Danny, how can my readers get their hands on a copy of Welcome to a Reformed Church?

Go online to Ligonier’s website or give them a call (800-435-4343). They have a great deal through their “Spread-the-Word” program where individuals and churches can get the book for as low as $3 per copy.

Thank you, again, brother, for the opportunity to share my story and the story of this book.

Thank you Danny for your service to the Body of Christ through works such as Welcome to a Reformed Church and for taking the time out of your busy schedule for this interview.

Tagged as // , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Filed in // Interviews

Comments [5]

January 17, 2010

Why are the Ten Commandments Still for New Covenant Believers?

Why do Reformed Christians (and the Reformed confessions) state that the moral law (the Ten Commandments) remains binding on all men of all ages? Dr. R. Scott Clark answers that question in his latest edition of the Heidelcast.

Clark makes reference to a series by the faculty of Westminster Seminary California entitled, The Law of God and the Christian. You can purchase and download the series via this link.

Tagged as // , , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [5]

Read the Westminster Standards in 40 Days

Joe Holland has organised a group of people online to read through the Westminster Standards in 40 days. His reading plan began yesterday / today (depending on your timezone) but it isn’t too late to start. I’ll be beginning today.

The Westminster Standards include the Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF), the Westminster Larger Catechism (WLC) and the Westminster Shorter Catechism (WSC).

You may also be blessed listening to Dr. Wayne Spear give five lectures on the history of the Westminster Assembly that I posted here last year.

If you’re on Twitter be sure to use the official hashtag, #wcs40.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [2]

December 17, 2009

There Are More than Tulips in the Reformed Field

Many, including Dr. Muller, have said it before; there is more to Reformed theology than the “five points” of Calvinism. Thanks to Eric Landry over at the White Horse Inn Blog for pointing me to an article by J. Todd Billings where he concludes:

The New Calvinists, with their God-centered message and their focus on dogmatic theology, make a robust contribution to contemporary ecclesial theological conversation. But they tend to obscure the fact that the Reformed tradition has a deeply catholic heritage, a Christ-centered sacramental practice and a wide-lens, kingdom vision for the Christian’s vocation in the world. The New Calvinists pick the TULIP from the Reformed field, overlooking the other flowers. There is much besides the TULIP in this spacious field that has grown from the seed of God’s word.

You can read all of J. Todd Billings article entitled, Calvin’s Comeback? – The Irresistible Reformer, over at The Christian Century.

Tagged as // , , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [7]

December 11, 2009

The Canons of Dordt

The Canons of Dordt (often referred to today as the “Five Points of Calvinism”) are expounded and explained by R. Scott Clark in an edition of Tabletalk Magazine from 2008:

Everyone knows the acronym TULIP, but not everyone knows where this acronym comes from. The Canons of Dordt are among the most famous but unread deliverances of any Reformed Synod. The canons are more than five letters. The canons teach a pastoral doctrine of grace and provide a model for the stewardship of the Gospel.

Read The Canons of Dordt by R. Scott Clark

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [2]

November 27, 2009

Dr. Muller asks "How Many Points?"

In an age where to be Reformed is equated with an adherence to “five points,” Dr. Muller asks the question, “How Many Points?”

I once met a minister who introduced himself to me as a “five-point Calvinist.” I later learned that, in addition to being a self-confessed five-point Calvinist, he was also an anti-paedobaptist who assumed that the church was a voluntary association of adult believers, that the sacraments were not means of grace but were merely “ordinances” of the church, that there was more than one covenant offering salvation in the time between the Fall and the eschaton, and that the church could expect a thousand-year reign on earth after Christ’s Second Coming but before the ultimate end of the world. He recognized no creeds or confessions of the church as binding in any way. I also found out that he regularly preached the “five points” in such a way as to indicate the difficulty of finding assurance of salvation: He often taught his congregation that they had to examine their repentance continually in order to determine whether they had exerted themselves enough in renouncing the world and in “accepting” Christ. This view of Christian life was totally in accord with his conception of the church as a visible, voluntary association of “born again” adults who had “a personal relationship with Jesus.”

In retrospect, I recognize that I should not have been terribly surprised at the doctrinal context or at the practical application of the famous five points by this minister — although at the time I was astonished. After all, here was a person, proud to be a five-point Calvinist, whose doctrines would have been repudiated by Calvin. In fact, his doctrines would have gotten him tossed out of Geneva had he arrived there with his brand of “Calvinism” at any time during the late sixteenth or the seventeenth century. Perhaps more to the point, his beliefs stood outside of the theological limits presented by the great confessions of the Reformed churches—whether the Second Helvetic Confession of the Swiss Reformed church or the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism of the Dutch Reformed churches or the Westminster standards of the Presbyterian churches. He was, in short, an American evangelical.

You can read Muller’s full article reproduced from the Calvin Theological Journal, Vol. 28 (1993): 425-33 over at the Riddleblog.

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [1]