July 14, 2010

Extemporaneous Preaching

I’ve previously mentioned an article R.C. Sproul contributed in The Preacher and Preaching: Reviving the Art in the Twentieth Century. What I didn’t mention was that in the same article he discussed the subject of extemporaneous preaching. It was around that same time that I listened to a lecture by Dr. John Carrick entitled The Extemporaneous Mode of Preaching. All of this, coupled with being challenged by my own pastor and my preaching lecturer, left me with some decisions to make in this regard. With a lot of prayer and a deep breath, I decided to move away from the safety of the fourteen-page manuscript I would normally take into the pulpit and instead I took only four.

As regular readers will know, extemporaneous preaching is just one of a number of areas related to preaching that has been on my mind over the past months.

Well, with that as a little bit of background, extemporaneous preaching has come up again. This time David Murray has re-posted an article originally written by his friend Jerrold Lewis, Pastor of Lacombe Free Reformed Church. You can read the article in its entirety here; however, here’s a short snippet:

I have found out recently that whenever you mention extemporaneous preaching to others, especially to others in the ministry, you are often met with some serious cautions such as, “Extemporaneous preaching lacks direction. It is less doctrinal. You will find yourself falling into the same rut, saying the same thing over and over”, etc. But what I have come to discover is many people confuse extemporaneous preaching with impromptu preaching. There is a big difference. Impromptu preaching is preaching on the spot, off the top of your head with no preparation, relying on the Holy Spirit to guide you. I am opposed to this practice as a model based on 2 Timothy 2:15, “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth”. I think this is mysticism plain and simple. However extemporaneous preaching is not of this species, not at all.

So preacher, what has been your experience with full manuscript vs. full notes vs. less notes vs. nothing, in the pulpit? Is there a one size fits all, or must we each examine our own giftings and preach by the enabling of the Spirit as best we can?

Read all of Without Notes.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [21]

July 7, 2010

Evangelistic Preaching

When Iain Murray gave several warnings regarding today’s resurgence of “expository preaching”, one of his concerns was the general demise of the “evangelistic sermon”. Remembering this, when I saw David Murray’s series, “What’s happened to Evangelistic Preaching?” I immediately download it. In that series David Murray addresses four key points:

  1. The Rarity of Evangelistic Preaching
  2. The Reasons for Evangelistic Preaching
  3. The Range of Evangelistic Preaching
  4. The Results of Evangelistic Preaching

This subject has been on my mind since Iain Murray first raised it, so David’s subsequent words have been extremely helpful in understanding what it is they were on about. I confess, I’d never considered anything within the Church besides a “teaching sermon”. I think I would fall into David Murray’s a “teaching sermon with an evangelistic PS” category. That said, I always aim to preach Christ and bring the Gospel forth throughout the sermon as the Gospel is for Christians too; however, if you read the series you’ll realise that “evangelistic preaching” is different again.

I’ve been challenged by this and I’ll continue to pray and read in this area. May I encourage you to read David Murray’s series, and I’ll leave you with a fascinating quote by Martin Lloyd-Jones (quoted in David’s series):

“If I am asked which sermons I wrote, I have already said that I used to divide my ministry, as I still do, into edification of the saints in the morning and a more evangelistic sermon in the evening. Well, my practice was to write my evangelistic sermon. I did so because I felt that in speaking to the saints, to the believers, one could feel more relaxed. There, one was speaking in the realm of the family. In other words, I believe that one should be unusually careful in evangelistic sermons. That is why the idea that a fellow who is merely gifted with a certain amount of glibness of speech and self-confidence, not to say cheek, can make an evangelist is all wrong. The greatest men should always be the evangelists, and generally have been; and the idea that Tom, Dick and Harry can be put up to speak on a street corner, but you must have a great preacher in a pulpit in a church is, to me, the reversing of the right order. It is when addressing the unbelieving world that we need to be most careful; and therefore I used to write my evangelistic sermon and not the other…”

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [3]

June 29, 2010

More Discussion On Preaching

I have appreciated the articles that have been posted of late challenging preachers in the area of preaching. Iain Murray offered some cautions, and then Anthony Selvaggio asked, “Are You Preaching To People?” Well today, Iain Campbell gives some thoughts on pulpit methodology and prods at the ‘sacred calf’ of consecutive preaching in the style of Calvin or Lloyd-Jones.

I’ll say again as I’ve done in my other posts. I appreciate that men are writing on the subject of preaching. You may disagree with some of their conclusions, but these men are not advocating a lower form of preaching; they’re genuinely calling their fellow labourers to better preaching in the pulpit.

Campbell concludes with two things that he is firmly committed to, and I’ll quote him in full.

At last, I know that I am committed to two things: to a stand-alone sermon, and to a Christ-exalting sermon. The first is necessary because it is just possible that someone may wander into church, not having heard the gospel before, and hearing it now for the first and last time. In that case, it will not do simply to refer to last week’s sermon, or anticipate next week’s. Each sermon must be a study in itself, a complete unit, which can be transported out of the church and into the life of the hearer.

But the second is equally necessary, because Christ is the theme of every part of Scripture. If my sermons do not exalt and speak of him, then no methodology will remedy that most glaring omission of all.

Be sure to read all of Iain Campbell’s thoughts on pulpit methodology.

Tagged as // , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [3]

June 25, 2010

Video Log – Social Media, Preaching, Language and Speech

Today is a cold and rainy day in Melbourne. It’s also my oldest daughters birthday. As we prepare for her birthday party I managed 15 minutes to record a video log entry. If you’re reading via RSS you may need to click here to watch it.

Below are some of the resources mentioned in the video log:

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // Video Log

Comments [2]

June 11, 2010

Anthony Selvaggio Asks, “Are You Preaching To People?”

I welcome Anthony’s thoughts on the subject and appreciate yet another call to biblical preaching. I’ll go ahead and quote Anthony’s challenging introduction but be sure to read his whole piece to learn the three things that prompted him to write the article and his concluding exhortation.

Relatively early in my preaching career I had the opportunity to preach the opening sermon at a conference. The main conference speaker was a man that I consider to be one of the finest preachers of our times. After hearing me preach he paid me a compliment that I did not fully appreciate or understand at the time. He said to me something like, “You are one of the few young preachers in the denomination who actually recognizes that he is preaching to people.” At first, I did not understand what he meant, but then I proceeded to listen to him preach over the subsequent days of the conference and as my heart was moved by God’s Word preached through him I began to get it.

Unfortunately, as I matured in my ministry I soon forgot that early lesson and drifted into a practice of “wikipreaching” in which I provided people with biblical facts rather than the Word preached. I preached at people rather than to people. I gave them research papers that proved my knowledge of the original languages and systematic theology, but tended little to their souls. I forgot that I was supposed to be preaching to people. How about you? Are you preaching to people?

Continue reading it here.

Tagged as // , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [0]

May 27, 2010

Preaching Matters For More Than Its Moment

…says Zack Eswine. He also says:

“There is always a point to preaching even if people do not respond…”

Please click-through to read Zack’s post especially if you’re a preacher. His words are a much needed encouragement to continue faithfully proclaiming His Word.

HT: Justin Taylor

Tagged as // , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [0]

May 25, 2010

Cautions on Expository Preaching

…are offered by Iain Murray; five in fact.

His cautions are timely and challenging for any preacher. Here is a quote Murray ends his article with taken from R. B. Kuiper:

“A simple and conversational, yet forceful delivery commands both respect and response. Enthusiasm inspires. Logic is convincing, the illogical confusing. As preachers let us have a heart. Let us stop wearying our audiences. Let us make our preaching so absorbingly interesting that even the children would rather listen to us than draw pictures and will thus put to shame their paper-and-pencil-supplying parents. But we may as well make up our minds that an absolute prerequisite of such preaching is the most painstaking preparation.”

Even if you don’t agree with all his conclusions, be sharpened as you seriously consider Murray’s five cautions.

Tagged as // , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [8]

May 1, 2010

Look To The Bridge!

T. David Gordon in Why Johnny Can’t Preach makes an effort to encourage Christological preaching as it “feeds the soul and builds faith.” (p.75) To illustrate his point he shares an excerpt from a wonderfully grace filled letter written by Clement Read Vaughan to theologian Robert Lewis Dabney. Dabney was blind, near death, and was doubting the the strength of his faith. Below is that letter in its entirety.

N. P. Manse,
February 3, 1890

Dear Dabney:

Yours of the 28th, just received, relieved a tension of feeling which has held me painfully ever since Mrs. Dabney’s last. I dreaded to hear, and then to hear you are in any degree better was an inexpressible comfort. It melted me to hear of your prayers for faith and dying grace. The stress of such constant and severe bodily pain is enough of itself to try you; and the tempter is sure to use it to affect your hope.

Pray on, dear old soldier, of course; but listen to me awhile. I want to give you a morsel of honey out of one of my dead lions, though, in fact, there is a large herd of them still living, and they roar on me often till I an sick with fears. You know we are sanctified through the truth. Sanctification is just the growth of the particular graces of the spirit, of which faith is one. Just here is where Christians make a great mistake. When they want more faith, or want to know whether things be believed, they turn their eyes inward and scrutinize their faith. They want to see something in their faith to trust in, something that will certify their faith. Of course, self-examination is all right, but not when it practically substitutes faith for our Lord, grace and righteousness. Even a great theological thinker is as apt to make that mistake when he has come into the practical stress of this awful world as a common Christian.

Now, suppose a traveler comes to a bridge, and he is in doubt about trusting himself to it. What does he do to breed confidence in the bridge? He don’t [sic] stand at the bridge-head and turn his thoughts curiously in on his own mind to see if he has confidence in the bridge. If his examination of the bridge gives him a certain amount of confidence, and yet he wants more, how does he make his faith grow? Why, in the same way; he still continues to examine the bridge.

Now, my dear old man, let your faith take care of itself for awhile, and you just think of what you are allowed to trust in. Think of the Master’s power, think of his love; think how he is interested in the soul that searches for him, and will not be comforted until he finds him. Think of what he has done, his work. That blood of his is mightier than all the sins of all the sinners that ever lived. Don’t you think it will master yours? Think of his great righteousness; will it not avail for all you hope to gain? That great work is enough; it needs not to be supplemented: it meets every demand. It warrants you to come into the King’s very presence, assured of welcome, because you can come in the name of the King’s Son. That work of Christ is like a bankrupt for ten thousand dollars allowed to draw on the revenues of an empire to pay out. Think of the Master when you want your faith to grow.

Now, dear old friend, I have done to you just what I would want you do to me if I were lying in your place. The great theologian, after all, is just like any other one of God’s children, and the simple gospel talked simply to him is just as essential to his comfort as it is to a milk-maid or to plow-boy. May God give you grace, not to lay too much stress on your faith, but to grasp the great ground of confidence, Christ, and all his work and all his personal fitness to be a sinner’s refuge. Faith is only an eye to see him. I have been praying that God would quiet your pains as you advance, and enable you to see the gladness of the gospel at every step. Good-bye. God be with you as he will. Think of the Bridge!

Your brother,

C. R. V.

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [1]

April 29, 2010

I Just Read “Why Johnny Can’t Preach” by T. David Gordon

It’s a short read but one you should undertake if you’re a minister or seminarian. If time permits I’ll post some thoughts / excerpts in the future.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [3]

April 6, 2010

Gospel Ministry Is More Than Preaching Sermons

…according to David Murray who offers some thoughts on answering the question, “Preach or Pastor?”

He notes:

“…most congregations will be able to tell you which way their pastor has answered that question: ‘He’s a great preacher, but we never see him,’ or, ‘He can’t preach, but he’s a wonderful pastor.’”

I agree with David Murray’s post but sadly I suspect there is a third category; those who can’t preach and who don’t visit and pastor their flock either.

Tagged as // , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [3]