February 16, 2010

Tweology (@tweology) Launched

Approximately 10 hours ago Tweology (@tweology) had its first official tweet.

“What is the chief end of man? Man’s chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever. (WSC.1)”

I’m thankful to all who are following so far and for all those who have re-tweeted or given shout-outs to @tweology.

For the first week I’m testing how helpful it is to repeat two of the daily tweets at differing times to help cater for those in the USA as well as my fellow Australians. If you’re in the USA it shouldn’t bother you (unless you’re on Twitter when you should be working) and if you’re an Aussie it shouldn’t bother you unless you’re awake really early in the morning.

If you’re not already you can follow @tweoloy on Twitter and/or find out more at the official website, Tweology.net. Presently a new web site and an official Tweology logo is being developed. Stay tuned!

Tagged as // , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [1]

February 11, 2010

Preparing to Launch Tweology (@tweology)

A fellow Aussie, Andy Tan, contacted me not too long ago asking if I had any ideas for a Twitter account he had registered (@tweology). I responded with several ideas. He liked them and agreed to pass the account over to me. I’m preparing to launch @tweology next week once there are a few more followers and I’ve prepared some more content. This is the temporary description from the official Tweology website:

“Tweology is a new Twitter account that will be ‘bringing theology to Twitter.’ Daily providing a mixture of theological tweets, including theological terms defined, quotations (or tweet summaries) from Reformed theologians and Reformed confessions.”

So if you’re a tweep (that is, one who’s on Twitter) please follow @tweology and let your friends online know about it.

Tagged as // , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [0]

January 25, 2010

Dispensationalism and Covenant Theology – Nathan Pitchford

Nathan Pitchford has produced some really helpful material in the past (remember his work on baptism). Well, he’s now released a book entitled Dispensationalism and Covenant Theology that can be purchased or downloaded for free.

Although I’ve not read the 258 pages (I’ve only just discovered its existence minutes ago!) looking through the table of contents and skimming a couple of sections leads me to conclude that this should be another beneficial addition to Pitchford’s collection.

If you have the money, consider encouraging Nathan Pitchford by purchasing a copy of Dispensationalism and Covenant Theology.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [4]

January 24, 2010

Circumcision and Baptism in Colossians 2:11-12

R. Scott Clark has a helpful piece discussing circumcision and baptism in Colossians 2:11-12.

If you’re interested in such topics you may benefit from reading the comments as well.

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [0]

January 17, 2010

Why are the Ten Commandments Still for New Covenant Believers?

Why do Reformed Christians (and the Reformed confessions) state that the moral law (the Ten Commandments) remains binding on all men of all ages? Dr. R. Scott Clark answers that question in his latest edition of the Heidelcast.

Clark makes reference to a series by the faculty of Westminster Seminary California entitled, The Law of God and the Christian. You can purchase and download the series via this link.

Tagged as // , , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [5]

January 7, 2010

Definition of Atonement

I’ve been reading William Symington: Penman of the Scottish Covenanters. It has been a blessing so far and I may post some more excerpts in the future; however, for now here’s Symington’s concise definition of the atonement:

“That perfect satisfaction given to the law and justice of God, by the sufferings and death of Jesus Christ, on behalf of elect sinners of mankind, on account of which they are delivered from condemnation.”

This quote, although reproduced in the aforementioned book was originally found in Symington, William. The Atonement and Intercession of Jesus Christ (p.12)

Tagged as // , , , , ,
Filed in // Quotes

Comments [8]

December 17, 2009

There Are More than Tulips in the Reformed Field

Many, including Dr. Muller, have said it before; there is more to Reformed theology than the “five points” of Calvinism. Thanks to Eric Landry over at the White Horse Inn Blog for pointing me to an article by J. Todd Billings where he concludes:

The New Calvinists, with their God-centered message and their focus on dogmatic theology, make a robust contribution to contemporary ecclesial theological conversation. But they tend to obscure the fact that the Reformed tradition has a deeply catholic heritage, a Christ-centered sacramental practice and a wide-lens, kingdom vision for the Christian’s vocation in the world. The New Calvinists pick the TULIP from the Reformed field, overlooking the other flowers. There is much besides the TULIP in this spacious field that has grown from the seed of God’s word.

You can read all of J. Todd Billings article entitled, Calvin’s Comeback? – The Irresistible Reformer, over at The Christian Century.

Tagged as // , , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [7]

December 11, 2009

The Canons of Dordt

The Canons of Dordt (often referred to today as the “Five Points of Calvinism”) are expounded and explained by R. Scott Clark in an edition of Tabletalk Magazine from 2008:

Everyone knows the acronym TULIP, but not everyone knows where this acronym comes from. The Canons of Dordt are among the most famous but unread deliverances of any Reformed Synod. The canons are more than five letters. The canons teach a pastoral doctrine of grace and provide a model for the stewardship of the Gospel.

Read The Canons of Dordt by R. Scott Clark

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [2]

Sproul Answers the Question, "What is Reformed Theology?"

Ligonier Ministries have launched their new website. Thanks to Tim Phillips I’ve discovered one of the many resources they offer is a free introductory video teaching series entitled “What is Reformed Theology?” by R. C. Sproul. Enjoy.

Tagged as // , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [3]

November 27, 2009

Dr. Muller asks "How Many Points?"

In an age where to be Reformed is equated with an adherence to “five points,” Dr. Muller asks the question, “How Many Points?”

I once met a minister who introduced himself to me as a “five-point Calvinist.” I later learned that, in addition to being a self-confessed five-point Calvinist, he was also an anti-paedobaptist who assumed that the church was a voluntary association of adult believers, that the sacraments were not means of grace but were merely “ordinances” of the church, that there was more than one covenant offering salvation in the time between the Fall and the eschaton, and that the church could expect a thousand-year reign on earth after Christ’s Second Coming but before the ultimate end of the world. He recognized no creeds or confessions of the church as binding in any way. I also found out that he regularly preached the “five points” in such a way as to indicate the difficulty of finding assurance of salvation: He often taught his congregation that they had to examine their repentance continually in order to determine whether they had exerted themselves enough in renouncing the world and in “accepting” Christ. This view of Christian life was totally in accord with his conception of the church as a visible, voluntary association of “born again” adults who had “a personal relationship with Jesus.”

In retrospect, I recognize that I should not have been terribly surprised at the doctrinal context or at the practical application of the famous five points by this minister — although at the time I was astonished. After all, here was a person, proud to be a five-point Calvinist, whose doctrines would have been repudiated by Calvin. In fact, his doctrines would have gotten him tossed out of Geneva had he arrived there with his brand of “Calvinism” at any time during the late sixteenth or the seventeenth century. Perhaps more to the point, his beliefs stood outside of the theological limits presented by the great confessions of the Reformed churches—whether the Second Helvetic Confession of the Swiss Reformed church or the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism of the Dutch Reformed churches or the Westminster standards of the Presbyterian churches. He was, in short, an American evangelical.

You can read Muller’s full article reproduced from the Calvin Theological Journal, Vol. 28 (1993): 425-33 over at the Riddleblog.

Tagged as // , , , , , ,
Filed in // General

Comments [1]